Tarico wrote an article on rape and religion, trying to prove that
rape is intrinsic to Christianity with the phenomenon that God raped
Mary the mother of Jesus
Valerie Tarico is an anti-Christian who claims she hates Jesus Christ, hates men and hates women who love them.
In a recent article on Salon.com, Tarico wrote an article on rape and religion, trying to prove that rape is intrinsic to Christianity with the phenomenon that God raped Mary the mother of Jesus.
“Powerful
gods and demi-gods impregnating human women – it’s a common theme in
the history of religion, and it’s more than a little rapey,” Tarico
writes.
“The impregnation process may be a
‘ravishing’ or seduction or some kind of titillating but nonsexual
procreative penetration,” she adds.
To show she is truly anti-religion, Tarico talks about some mythical stories involving Zeus, Jupiter, Buddha, and others, before finally zeroing in on the true targets of her anger: Christ, Mary, and God the Father.
Tarico says:"Though
the earliest Christians had a competing story, in the Gospel of Luke,
the Virgin Mary gets pregnant when the spirit of the Lord comes upon her
and the power of the Most High overshadows her. … Mary assents after
being not asked but told by a powerful supernatural being what is going
to happen to her, “Behold the bond slave of the Lord: be it done to me
…”
Who needs consent, freely given? If he’s a god, she’s got to want it, right? That is how the stories play out.
Whether
or not the delectable young thing puts up a protest, whether or not
seduction requires deception, whether or not the woman already has a
husband or love, whether or not she is physically forced, the basic
assumption is that the union between a god and a woman is overwhelming
in an orgasmic way, not a bloody, head-bashed-against-the-ground kind of
way. And afterwards? Well, what woman wouldn’t want to be pregnant with
the son or daughter of a god?"
“Powerful
men not only want to control the valuable commodity of female
fertility, they should. Gods ordain it and model it. And they prescribe
punishments for those – especially females – who violate the proper
order of things,” she asserts.
Within a
society that treats female sexuality as a male possession , the only
consent that can be violated is the consent of a woman’s owner, the man
with the rights to her reproductive capacity – typically her father,
fiancé, or husband . Many Christians are surprised when told that
nowhere in the Bible, either Old Testament or New, does any writer say
that a woman’s consent is necessary or even desirable before sex.
“This omission is more than regrettable, it is tragic,” she says.
"But
even closer to home for many is the shocking prevalence on college
campuses and in society at large of sexual manipulation and coercion
perpetrated by males who otherwise seem morally intact. One can’t help
but notice that a large number of high profile cases involve high status
males: fraternity members, a famous actor, a radio host, small town
football stars and big league professional athletes – men, in other
words, who think they are gods."
“Convinced
of their own deific qualities, it just follows that the object of their
[men’s] attentions has gotta want it – and if she doesn’t, well, that’s
fine too, because when a god wants a woman, consent isn't really part
of the story, ” Tarico concluded.
No comments:
Post a Comment